“The Christian is the one whose imagination should fly
beyond the stars.”
Francis Schaeffer
Introduction
The Crucifixion - Georges Rouault
|
What role should the arts play in the Christian life? By “arts” I mean all
vehicles of creative expression, including but not limited to: painting, sculpture,
music, architecture, fashion, photography, dance, television and film. Can
art be used to the glory of God or is it just another way of sneaking sin in
through the back door?
There
has been a sharp decline in the importance and cultivation of the arts in the
evangelical community over the past century, and it has been to our detriment.
The enjoyment of God's creation and man's creativity as God's image-bearers
have been relegated to the basement of Christian consciousness, often looked
upon as a worldly pursuit. I believe this has been one of the major contributing
factors leading to Christianity's ineffectiveness upon our culture. As British
satirist, P.G. Wodehouse said, “Whenever Christians, and evangelicals in particular,
have attempted to ‘reach the world' through the media – TV, film, publishing
and so on – the thinking public gets the firm idea that, like soup in a bad
restaurant, Christians' brains are better left unstirred.”
If we wish to regain even a small foothold of influence in today's world,
we must begin with a fresh study of the subject from God's perspective. Some
of the world's greatest paintings, sculptures, architecture, and music have
been inspired by the Christian faith. The Bible has much to say about beauty,
art, and mankind's enjoyment of creativity as a good gift of the Creator.
Beauty is in the Eye of the Ultimate Beholder
Aesthetics is the branch of philosophy that is concerned with beauty. Throughout
history philosophers and artists have sought to answer the question, “What
is beautiful?” The tired cliché, “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder,” is
taken as gospel truth without a second thought today. But this is actually
an attempt of marrying the philosophy of relativism and aesthetics. What is
beautiful? The relativist answers: Whatever I think is beautiful, because I
am the measure of all things.
The Fountain – Marcel Duchamp
|
This
philosophical mindset has taken over the established art world today and has
led to an uncritical acceptance of art that is debase, technically poor, and
created with the purpose of shocking. In short, art that is ugly. Defenders
of such art often express a personal distaste for it, but then they raise questions
that reveal their own aesthetic uncertainties: “Who is to say what art is?
Who are we to question the creative expressions of an artist? Who is to say
what is beautiful and good?” The Christian must not shy away from such questions,
because we are the only community that has a viable answer.
Beauty is only possible if we assume God's existence as the Great Artist who
made color, shape, and texture. True beauty is in the eye of the Ultimate Beholder
of all things because God is the measure of all things, including beauty. Is
a flower in the desert beautiful even though no man ever sees it? Yes. Since
the God who created it sees it, it is beautiful regardless of whether man ever
sees it.
Gene Veith aptly points out, “Just as the current intellectual establishment
has lost its conceptual basis for truth, the artistic establishment has lost
its conceptual basis for beauty. A Christian view of the arts can supply both.”
Imago Dei
The support for the arts and man's creativity comes
very early in Scripture. In the book of Genesis you see the Master Artist creating ex
nihilo (out
of nothing). At the very onset of creation the prerequisites for art are established – light,
space, and unity. God then created the details, calling forth earth, vegetation,
water, and finally human beings:
Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness.
And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the
birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth
and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” So God
created man in his own image, in the image of God he created them;
male and female he created them. (Genesis 1:26-27)
Adam and Eve - Lucas Cranach the Elder
|
Humans were created in the image and likeness of God, who were themselves
empowered to create. This is central in understanding our humanity. It means,
among other things, that since God is personal, human beings are personal.
As Veith points out, “Those qualities that go into being a person – consciousness,
the capacity to think and to feel, to will, act, respond, communicate, and
enter into relationships – are inherent in human beings as in no other part
of creation.”
Part of God's personality is his ability to create, a capacity inherent in
those who are his image-bearers. In the Genesis account above, you see that
man was given dominion over the world. This dominion has implications for and
includes, the arts, since an artist does nothing more than fashion his art
out of the materials of the earth in one way or another.
Although
the beauty of the garden was vandalized through man's fall into sin, and nature
itself was cursed, it was not completely effaced. Sin shattered the divine
image in man, but did not erase it altogether. Man's ability to create after
the fall remains as a signpost pointing to God's original artistry in creation.
The universe God created is not only functional; it is also beautiful. Being
made in the image of God means that the purpose of life is greater than just
surviving, as if life were nothing more than a bigger version of the Survivor
reality show. We have the ability not only to perceive beauty, but also to
create and enjoy God through our creations. The impulse within us to create
and enjoy is an inescapable mark of the divine image.
Brian Thomas is the minister of music at Kaleo
Church in San Diego, CA. His band is named Bezalel after
the first artisan of the Bible. He also is an artist represented by the
Artist Forum Gallery of Kensington. He holds a Bachelor of Arts in Biblical
History from Puget Sound Christian College (but don't hold that against
him). He is a Fellow of the Kaleo Institute
of Cultural Research where
he will be heading up the department of Worship and the Arts in 2005.
P.G. Wodehouse as quoted by Franky Schaeffer, Addicted
to Mediocrity , (Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 1981), p. 11.
Gene Edward Veith, Jr. State of
the Arts: From Bezalel to Mapplethorpe , (Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books,
1991) p. 21.
Ibid., p. 147
See Anthony A. Hoekema, Created
in God's Image , (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1986),
for a more comprehensive study of this doctrine. I highly recommend this
book.
Thanks for the article, no what I was specting (after reading Von Balthasar, and Pannenberg); but you confirm my thouths about the lack of christian culture. The Church as institution dosen't have a strong opinion about art; the concept that art belongs to the devil o the world dosen't help much; or the desire for the heavinly kingdom give a fundamentalist excuse. The church read a lot about and from christian authors, and just step on the rest of the information. The no-christian literature is not worth the effort. A century avoiding books, what a contradiction for a body that preach the love for a Book. Well, your article is a start, for that Thanks. It seems that this kind of behaviour its apply to others fields between christians , and no christians. To find the right transition is always the hard part. Good luck. Posted by Manuel Ardon | Posted at 07/27/2006 9:12 AM